However the StringBuilder class differs from the StringBuffer class on the basis of synchronization. The StringBuilder class provides no guarantee of synchronization whereas the StringBuffer class does. Therefore this class is designed for use as a drop-in replacement for StringBuffer in places where the StringBuffer was being used by a single thread as is generally the case.
Where possible, it is recommended that this class be used in preference to StringBuffer as it will be faster under most implementations.
Instances of StringBuilder are not safe for use by multiple threads. If such synchronization is required then it is recommended that StringBuffer be used.
Class Hierarchy: java. Get hold of all the important Java Foundation and Collections concepts with the Fundamentals of Java and Java Collections Course at a student-friendly price and become industry ready. StringBuilder int capacity : Constructs a string builder with no characters in it and an initial capacity specified by the capacity argument.
StringBuilder CharSequence seq : Constructs a string builder that contains the same characters as the specified CharSequence. StringBuilder String str : Constructs a string builder initialized to the contents of the specified string. Below is a sample program to illustrate StringBuilder in Java:. StringBuilder appendCodePoint int codePoint : This method appends the string representation of the codePoint argument to this sequence.
IntStream chars : This method returns a stream of int zero-extending the char values from this sequence. IntStream codePoints : This method returns a stream of code point values from this sequence. StringBuilder delete int start, int end : This method removes the characters in a substring of this sequence. StringBuilder deleteCharAt int index : This method removes the char at the specified position in this sequence.
StringBuilder insert int offset, boolean b : This method inserts the string representation of the booalternatelean argument into this sequence. StringBuilder insert : This method inserts the string representation of the char argument into this sequence. StringBuilder replace int start, int end, String str : This method replaces the characters in a substring of this sequence with characters in the specified String. StringBuilder reverse : This method causes this character sequence to be replaced by the reverse of the sequence.
It works like a mutable String object. The append method helps to avoid all the copying required in string concatenation. However, Java does this string concatenation using StringBuilder by default for the simple cases..
From the Java specifications :. To increase the performance of repeated string concatenation, a Java compiler may use the StringBuffer class or a similar technique to reduce the number of intermediate String objects that are created by evaluation of an expression.
The above code will produce the following bytecode:. As you can see in the bytecode, StringBuilder is used. So we don't need to use StringBuilder anymore in Java. However, This is true for the simple cases. If you need to concatenate inside the loop, it is always suggested to use StringBuilder. For simple string concatenation, you need not use StringBuilder , java compiler will do the trick for you.
However, if you need to concatenate inside a loop, you need to manually apply StringBuilder. For better understanding please go to this link. Edit: The earlier I made this case with only Java 8. In this specific case, most recent JDK's will actually optimize the code into the StringBuilder version in any case.
You usually only really need to do it manually if you are doing string concatenation in a loop or in some complex code that the compiler can't easily optimize. Do the same tests in your environment and check if newer JDK or your Java implementation do some type of string operation better with String or better with StringBuilder. Some compilers may not replace any string concatenations with StringBuilder equivalents. Be sure to consider which compilers your source will use before relying on compile time optimizations.
This method copies the characters of the two strings, so it has memory requirements and runtime complexity proportional to the length of the two strings. StringBuilder works more efficent. So this might not be an issue at all. Though I would really check this statement if I depend on it in my code!
The problem with String concatenation is that it leads to copying of the String object with all the associated cost. StringBuilder is not threadsafe and is therefore faster than StringBuffer, which used to be the preferred choice before Java 5. As a rule of thumb, you should not do String concatenation in a loop, which will be called often. I guess doing a few concatenations here and there will not hurt you as long as you are not talking about hundreds and this of course depends on your performance requirements.
If you are doing real time stuff, you should be very careful. The Microsoft certification material addresses this same question. In the. NET world, the overhead for the StringBuilder object makes a simple concatenation of 2 String objects more efficient. I would assume a similar answer for Java strings.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Asked 10 years, 10 months ago. Active 4 years, 5 months ago. Viewed k times. Improve this question. Peter Mortensen 29k 21 21 gold badges 97 97 silver badges bronze badges.
See this blog post for a detailed explanation: rationaljava. Add a comment.
0コメント