When was sfas 123r effective

Previous Article Next Article. Article Navigation. Research Article September 01 This Site. Google Scholar.

Journal of Financial Reporting 4 2 : 33— Article history Received:. Cite Icon Cite. You do not currently have access to this content. View full article. Sign in Don't already have an account? Modification of Outstanding Awards. No Deferral Features with Awards. If you have any media inquiries or would like additional information, please click here. For private companies, FAS R becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, Choice of Model Binomial Lattice models vs.

Binomial Lattice models, unlike Black-Scholes, allow a company to model such things as stock volatility, black-out periods and forfeiture rate by year, which could be significant for some companies.

Customizing a basic binomial model to handle real world demographic and behavioral assumptions requires more training than a basic Black-Scholes model. In most cases the money saved using the Binomial Lattice model more than compensates for any increased expense due to the additional complexity of the model. How Modeling Impacts Value of Options Key variables of lattice models are: time to maturity, dividend yield, share price volatility based on future expectations, vesting period, forfeiture rates, blackout periods, and the choice of the optimal number of lattice steps.

Boards should familiarize themselves with how key variables affect the stock option value, and adjust stock option grants and valuation methodologies appropriately. Because of this, vesting may be performance based or service based or both, and, regardless, options must be valued and expensed as of grant date. Boards have more flexibility in assigning certain performance criteria to stock option grants without the worry of having to deal with variable accounting and the resulting earnings fluctuations that this can cause.

Under the amendment: The dollar values required to be reported in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns of the Summary Compensation Table and the Director Compensation Table are revised to disclose the compensation cost of those awards, before reflecting forfeitures, over the requisite service period, as described in FAS R.

Forfeitures are required to be described in accompanying footnotes. The Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table is revised to require disclosure of the grant date fair value of each individual equity award, computed in accordance with FAS R, and the Director Compensation Table required under Item of Regulation S-K is revised to require footnote disclosure of the same information.

The Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table is revised to require disclosure of any option or stock appreciation right that was repriced or otherwise materially modified during the last completed fiscal year, including the incremental fair value, computed as of the repricing or modification date in accordance with FAS R, and the Director Compensation Table required under Item of Regulation S-K is revised to require footnote disclosure of the same incremental fair value information.

The amendment is being made in the form of interim final rules that will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register.